KMID : 0806120190490050505
|
|
´ëÇÑ°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2019 Volume.49 No. 5 p.505 ~ p.514
|
|
Changes in Strauss & Corbin¡¯s Grounded Theory
|
|
Kim Ji-Eun
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Purpose: This study aimed to introduce and elucidate changes in Strauss and Corbin¡¯s grounded theory and discuss its application to the field of nursing in South Korea.
Methods: The changes in grounded theory by Strauss and Corbin were examined through a literature review of grounded theory from its inception.
Results: Strauss and Corbin acknowledged their philosophical backgrounds of symbolic interactionism and pragmatism; however, their methodology based on positivism overwhelmed their epistemology and ontology. This inconsistency has been represented by the coding paradigm and the premise of ¡°emergent from the data.¡± In the revised version of Basics, Strauss and Corbin modified their theory to weaken the coding paradigm and strengthen the strategies for the development of substantive theory.
Conclusion: Strauss and Corbin¡¯s revised grounded theory did not fully address the inconsistency of their epistemology and ontology between their acknowledgement and methodology. However, these changes constitute a meaningful step toward resolving inconsistencies and highlight the development of substantive theory. This has implications for Korean nursing researchers who have utilized methodologies in grounded theory with dogmatic approaches; grounded theory, with its evolving nature, is not a finalized method and calls for open approaches for the development of a grounded theory that fits Korean nursing.
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
Grounded Theory, Symbolic Interactionism, Review
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|