|
KMID : 0880420220230030322
|
|
Korean Journal of Radiology
2022 Volume.23 No. 3 p.322 ~ p.332
|
|
|
Diagnostic Accuracy of CT for Evaluating Circumferential Resection Margin Status in Resectable or Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Head Cancer: A Prospective Study Using Axially Sliced Surgical Pathologic Correlation
|
|
Park Ji-Hoon
Yoon Yoo-Seok
Lee Seung-Jae
Kim Hae-Young
Han Ho-Seong
Lee Jun-Suh
Chang Won
Kim Hae-Ryoung
Na Hee-Young
Han Seung-Yeob
Lee Kyoung-Ho
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Objective: CT plays a central role in determining the resectability of pancreatic cancer, which directs the use of neoadjuvant therapy. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CT in predicting circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer.
Materials and Methods: Seventy-seven patients who were scheduled for upfront surgery for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer were prospectively enrolled, and 75 patients (38 male and 37 female; mean age ± standard deviation, 68 ± 11 years) were finally analyzed. The CRM status was evaluated separately for the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and posterior and superior mesenteric vein/portal vein (SMV/PV) margins. Three independent radiologists reviewed the preoperative CT images and evaluated the resection margin status. The reference standard for CRM status was pathologic examination of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens in an axial plane perpendicular to the axis of the second portion of the duodenum. The diagnostic accuracy of CT was assessed for overall CRM involvement, defined as involvement of the SMA or posterior margins (per-patient analysis), and involvement of each of the three resection margins (per-margin analysis). The data were pooled using a crossed random effects model.
Results: Forty patients had pathologically confirmed overall CRM involvement in pancreatic cancer, while CRM involvement was not seen in 35 patients. For overall CRM involvement, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 15% (95% confidence interval: 7%?49%) and 99% (96%?100%), respectively. For each of the resection margins, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 14% (9%?54%) and 99% (38%?100%) for the SMA margin, 12% (8%?46%) and 99% (97%?100%) for the posterior margin; and 37% (29%?53%) and 96% (31%?100%) for the SMV/PV margin, respectively.
Conclusion: CT showed very high specificity but low sensitivity in predicting pathological CRM involvement in pancreatic cancer.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Carcinoma, pancreatic ductal, Margins of excision, Multidetector computed tomography, Neoadjuvant therapy, Sensitivity and specificity
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
 
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
    
|
|