KMID : 1011920200210010006
|
|
International Journal of Arrhythmia 2020 Volume.21 No. 1 p.6 ~ p.6
|
|
Accuracy of implantable loop recorders for detecting atrial tachyarrhythmias after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation
|
|
Cho Hyun-Jung
Lee Cheol-Hyun Hwang Jong-Min Park Hyoung-Seob Choi Sang-Woong Kim In-Cheol Cho Yun-Kyeong Yoon Hyuck-Jun Kim Hyung-Seop Nam Chang-Wook Hur Seung-Ho Jung Byung-Chun Kim Yoon-Nyun Han Seong-Wook
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Background: Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) can provide an enhanced possibility to detect atrial fibrillation (AF), but the accuracy, especially the positive predictive value (PPV), is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of ILRs for detecting AF through a comparison with Holter.
Method and results: Thirteen patients who underwent AF ablation were enrolled. ILRs were implanted in all patients, who were scheduled to have Holter monitorings after the procedure. The incidence of AF was compared between the two modalities and analyzed for any correlations. A total of 51 Holters (67,985.5 min) and concomitant ILRs were available for the comparison. The judgment of the presence of AF did not perfectly correlate between the ILR and Holter (Kappa?=?0.866, P?0.001). In the ILR data, the sensitivity of detecting AF on the Holter was 81.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.812?0.820; P?0.001). The specificity was 99.9% (95% CI 0.998?0.999; P?0.001). When the ILR detected AF, the PPV was 99.5% (95% CI 0.994?0.995), but the ILR did not detect AF, and the negative predictive value was 94.2% (95% CI 0.941?0.944). A separate analysis of AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) showed that the AT detection rate of the ILR was 2.3%.
Conclusion: The ILR had a low false positive value and high PPV for AF events. However, it was limited in identifying AT.
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
Implantable loop recorder, Holter, Atrial fibrillation, Atrial tachycardia
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|