|
KMID : 1012020170060020090
|
|
Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Science
2017 Volume.6 No. 2 p.90 ~ p.95
|
|
|
Perception and use of gait measures among physical therapists in South Korea
|
|
Jang Ho-Young
Kim You-Lim
Kim Sung-Jin
Yoon Tak-Yong
Kim Kyung-Hun
Ahn Ick-Keun
Lee Suk-Min
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the physical therapists’ perception of the use of gait measures, the frequency of the gait measures used, and also to identify the barriers that limit the use of these assessment tools.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Methods: Physical therapists from the Seoul, Gyeonggi area from March to July 2016 were included in the study. Over the course of 18 weeks, a cross-sectional study was conducted with a self-report questionnaire. A total of 700 questionnaires were distributed and 350 questionnaires (50%) were collected, however with the exclusion of 140 questionnaires due to non-consent, a total of 210 questionnaires (30%) were analysed.
Results: Out of the 10 standardized assessment tools, the therapists showed the highest perception for the timed up and go test (TUG [n=153, 72.9%]) and they also had high perception for the 10 meters walk test (10MWT [n=149, 71.0%]), and 6-minute walk test (6MWT [n=123, 58.6%]). The respondents answered that the TUG (n=116, 55.2%), 10MWT (n=100, 47.6%), and 6MWT (n=51, 24.3%) was used the most often. On the contrary, only four (1.9%) therapists have used the Chedoke-McMaster stroke assessment and the Rivermead Mobility Index. The lack of time was considered as the most important barrier to the use of assessment tools in clinical practice.
Conclusions: Through this study, it has been shown that the domestic physical therapists used the TUG and the 10MWT mainly due to high recognition and evaluation status; however, the lack of time was the greatest impediment to the clinical application of the gait assessment tools.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Gait, Measurement tools, Physical therapists
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|
|