Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1024620230430061055
Food Science of Animal Resources
2023 Volume.43 No. 6 p.1055 ~ p.1066
Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat
Ermie Jr. Mariano

Lee Da-Young
Yun Seung-Hyeon
Lee Ju-Hyun
Lee Seung-Yun
Hur Sun-Jin
Abstract
The cultured meat industry is continuously evolving due to the collective efforts of cultured meat companies and academics worldwide. Though still technologically limited, recent reports of regulatory approvals for cultured meat companies have initiated the standards-based approach towards cultured meat production. Incidents of deception in the meat industry call for fool-proof authentication methods to ensure consumer safety, product quality, and traceability. The cultured meat industry is not exempt from the threats of food fraud. Meat authentication techniques based on DNA, protein, and metabolite fingerprints of animal meat species needs to be evaluated for their applicability to cultured meat. Technique-based categorization of cultured meat products could ease the identification of appropriate authentication methods. The combination of methods with high sensitivity and specificity is key to increasing the accuracy and precision of meat authentication. The identification of markers (both physical and biochemical) to differentiate conventional meat from cultured meat needs to be established to ensure overall product traceability. The current review briefly discusses some areas in the cultured meat industry that are vulnerable to food fraud. Specifically, it targets the current meat and meat product authentication tests to emphasize the need for ensuring the traceability of cultured meat.
KEYWORD
cultured meat, food fraud, authentication, traceability
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information