|
KMID : 1145220230200010374
|
|
Neurospine
2023 Volume.20 No. 1 p.374 ~ p.389
|
|
|
A 30-Year Worldwide Research Productivity of Scientific Publication in Full-Endoscopic Decompression Spine Surgery: Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis
|
|
Yanting Liu
Vit Kotheeranurak
Javier Quillo-Olvera
Van Isseldyk Facundo
Sagar Sharma
Siravich Suvithayasiri
Khanathip Jitpakdee
Guang-Xun Lin
Akaworn Mahatthanatrakul
Hussam Jabri
Ashwinkumar Vasant Khandge
Rajendra B. Aher
Meng-Huang Wu
Angela Wing Hang Ho
Nang Man Raymond Wong
Lau Sun Wing
Kutbuddin Akbary
Kandarpkumar K. Patel
Boonserm Pakdeenit
Kuo Tai Chen
Kim Hye-Jun
Milin S. Jaiswal
Lee Sang-Jun
Ghazwan A. Hasan
Luigi Andrew Sabal
Luigi Andrew Sabal
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Objective : The ever-growing number of articles related to full-endoscopic spine surgery published in the last few decades presents a challenge which is perplexing and time-consuming in identifying the current research status. The study aims to identify and analyze the most cited works related to full-endoscopic decompression spine surgery, compare the articles published by different publishers and area, and show the current publication status of full-endoscopic research.
Methods : Using Bibliometrix, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer, we analyzed the bibliometric data selected from the Web of Science database between 1992 and 2022. Spine has the highest H-index with the most-cited journal in the field of full-endoscopic decompression spine surgery. China ranked as the most productive country, whereas the most cited with high H-index papers came from South Korea. For the author analysis, Yeung AT, Ruetten S, Hoogland T, Ahn Y, Choi G, and Mayer HM were the most impactful authors in the global and local citations. The most productive organization is Wooridul Spine Hospital.
Conclusion : The bibliometric study showed a growing trend of research on full-endoscopic decompression spine surgery over the past 30 years. It has demonstrated that there is a significant increase in the number of authors, institutions, and internationally collaborated countries. However, the quality of studies is still low, and the lack of high-quality clinical evidence and the trend of general journal submissions has somewhat affected the quality of endoscopy journals in recent years.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
bibliometric analysis, citation analysis, spine, spine surgery, VOSviewer, CiteSpace
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|
|