Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1148020160410040120
Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ÀÇ´ë³í¹®Áý
2016 Volume.41 No. 4 p.120 ~ p.124
Evaluation of the Clinical Usability of Sterile Bag Collection Urinalysis and Urine Culture for the Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection in Infants with Unexplained Fever
Lee Ki-Kang

Park Byeong-Bae
Jang Hae-In
Cho Hyoung-Min
Kim Eun-Young
Kim Kyoung-Sim
Kim Yong-Wook
Lee Myung-Hee
Kim Young
Abstract
The study aimed to evaluate the usability of sterile bag collection (SBC) urinalysis and urine culture for diagnosing urinary
tract infections (UTI). Urine culture is key for diagnosing UTI, and transurethral catheterization (TUC) or suprapubic aspiration is recommended for non-toilet-trained children. Although urine testing using SBC is non-invasive and easy, UTI can be diagnosed only if other criteria including clinical symptoms and positive urinalysis results are met. This study included 228 infants who were hospitalized for unexplained fever from October 2015 to June 2016. TUC culture, SBC urinalysis, and urine culture were performed for all patients. UTI was diagnosed when the TUC culture results met the criterion of ¡Ã104 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL. When UTI diagnosis was made based on SBC urine colony counts ¡Ã105 CFU/mL, the false-positive and false-negative rates were 6.3% and 70.0%, respectively. When the criterion was set as ¡Ã104 CFU/mL, they were 23.7% and 30.0%, respectively. When both the criteria of ¡Ã105 CFU/mL and positive urinalysis results were met, the false-positive rate was 2.4%, and the false-negative rate was 80%. Our results suggest that diagnosing UTI using SBC urinalysis and urine culture is not useful in infants with unexplained fever.
KEYWORD
Urinary tract infection, Fever, Infants, Urine specimen collection, Bag urine collection
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information