Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1155820150100020089
Neurointervention
2015 Volume.10 No. 2 p.89 ~ p.93
Does a Low-wall Coverage Stent Have a Flow Diverting Effect in Small Aneurysms?
Liu Hairi

Choe Joo-Ae
Jung Seung-Chul
Song Yun-Sun
Yang Ku-Hyun
Park Kye-Jin
Goo Hae-Won
Park Won-Hyong
Suh Dae-Chul
Abstract
Backbround and Purpose: The flow diverting effect of a low-wall coverage stent remains controversial. We evaluted patients who underwent stenting for small aneurysms with a low but potential risk of growth and reviewed related literature.

Materials and Methods: We evaluated 9 small aneurysms among 19 unruptured intracranial aneurysms from eight patients who underwent stenting. The patients had unexplainable severe headache (n = 8), aneurysm originating from the anterior choroidal artery (n = 3), potential growth or rupture risks including hypertension (n = 5), and multiple aneurysms (n = 6). Stents with a relatively low-wall coverage ratio (8-10%) were used. Clinical and angiographic outcomes were assessed.

Results: One (n = 8) or two stents (n = 1) were used without any procedural difficulties or complications. Although no immediate changes of aneurysm morphology were observed, aneurysms decreased in size (n = 8) when examined by DSA (n = 8) or MRA (n = 1) during a median 28.9-month follow-up. There were no adverse events, including thromboembolism, aneurysm rupture, or stent movement during a median 31.9-month clinical follow-up (range: 17-69 months).

Conclusion: Although a variable degree of aneurysm size decrease may not prevent further growth or rupture of small aneurysms, stenting with a low-wall coverage ratio may have some advantageous hemodynamic effect. Flow modification of stent architecture vs. aneurysm characteristics, including size and location, on long-term outcome, requires further clarification.
KEYWORD
Stent, Intracranial aneurysm, Hemodynamics
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø