Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1188520110070020067
Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology
2011 Volume.7 No. 2 p.67 ~ p.73
Clinical comparison about post-operative bowel function recovery between Seprafilm¨Þ and Adept¨Þ which used in colorectal cancer operation as an adhesion reduction agents
Hong Yoon-Hwa

Lee Won-Suk
Baek Jeong-Heum
Lee Jung-Nam
Lee Woon-Ki
Choi Sang-Tae
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes between Seprafilm¨Þ, Adept¨Þ groups and control group in colorectal surgery for colorectal cancer.

Methods: we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who had undergone a colorectal surgery between February 2008 and January 2010.The patient¡¯s demographic and operative outcomes were also evaluated. Of the 454 patients, 114 patients received Seprafilm, 180 patients received Adept¨Þ and 160 patients in the no additive control group. The age, gender and operative times among three groups were similar.

Results: Small bowel obstruction developed in 16 patients in the Adept¨Þ group (8.9%), in Seprafilm¨Þ group 5 patients (4.4%), in the control group 11 patients (6.9%) had small intestinal obstruction. The overall incidence was significantly higher in Adept¨Þ group than in the Seprafilm¨Þ group and the control group with statistical significance (Adept¨Þ vs Seprafilm¨Þ; P = 0.043 Adept¨Þ vs Control group, P = 0.002)

Conclusion: The application of Seprafilm¨Þ did not reduce the rate of small bowel obstruction in patients undergoing colorectal surgery for colorectal cancer as compared with no additive group and the application of Adept¨Þ increased the rate of small bowel obstruction . Thus, it should be considered when using of Adept¨Þ in colorectal cancer operation as an adhesion reduction agents.
KEYWORD
adhesion, ileus, adhesion reduction agents
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)