Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1201620100030020051
Journal of Women s Medicine
2010 Volume.3 No. 2 p.51 ~ p.56
Two-dimensional Largest ovarian area to predict ovarian response in in vitro fertilization cycle
Kim Sang-Don

Jee Byung-Chul
Suh Chang-Suk
Kim Seok-Hyun
Choi Young-Min
Kim Jung-Gu
Moon Shin-Yong
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of two dimensional largest ovarian area (LOA) as a predictive parameter of oocyte yield and pregnancy in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle.

Methods: Ninety?two stimulated IVF cycles from sixty?eight infertile women were included. On the day 3 of cycles, antral follicle count (AFC) and LOA were measured by ultrasonography before starting gonadotropins. LOA was calculated by ellipsoid formula (D1¡¿D2¡¿0.8) using two perpendicular diameters in the largest cross?sectional view of each ovary and then summed.

Results: Both LOA and AFC had a positive correlation with the number of retrieved oocytes. The best cut?off value of LOA was 6.14 cm2 for predicting poor ovarian response (area under curve [AUC], 0.783; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.684 to 0.862), 7.70 cm2 for predicting cycle cancellation (AUC, 0.794; 95% CI, 0.697 to 0.871) and 8.36 cm2 for predicting pregnancy (AUC, 0.641; 95% CI, 0.534 to 0.739). For AFC, the best cut?off value was 9 for poor ovarian response (AUC, 0.877; 95% CI, 0.792 to 0.936), 6 for predicting cycle cancellation (AUC, 0.942; 95% CI, 0.872 to 0.980) and 9 for pregnancy (AUC, 0.683; 95% CI, 0.578 to 0.776). The predictability for pregnancy was similar between LOA and AFC.

Conclusion: LOA is easy to measure and a good marker for predicting ovarian response and IVF pregnancy.
KEYWORD
Ovarian response, Ultrasonography, Antral follicle count, Ovarian size, In vitro fertilization
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information