|
KMID : 1204320210370010018
|
|
Laboratory Animal Research
2021 Volume.37 No. 1 p.18 ~ p.18
|
|
|
Working with laboratory rodents in Spain: a survey on welfare and wellbeing
|
|
Goni-Balentziaga Olatz
Ortega-Saez Ivan
Vila Sergi
Azkona Garikoitz
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Background: Replacement, reduction and refinement, the 3R principles, provide a framework to minimize the use and suffering of animals in science. In this context, we aimed to determine the actual perception that individuals working with laboratory rodents in biomedical research have on animal welfare and on their interaction with the animals, as well as how they perceive its impact on their social relations. To this end, we designed an anonymous on-line survey for people working with rodents, at three responsibility levels, in Spain.
Results: Of the 356 participants, 239 were women (67?%); 263 were researchers (74?%), and 93 animal facility staff (26?%), of which 55 were caretakers/technicians (15?%), and 38 welfare officer/veterinarians (11?%). Animal facility staff indicated environmental enrichment to be a universal practice. About half of the participants reported that, in their opinion, animals suffer “little to none” or “minor” stress and pain. Animal caretakers/technicians and researchers perceived higher levels of stress and pain than welfare officers/veterinarians. Participants judged decapitation the most unpleasant method to kill rodents, whereas anaesthetic overdose was the least one. A sizable proportion ??21?% of animal caretakers/technicians and 11.4?% of researchers - stated that they were never given the choice not to euthanize the rodents they work with. Overall, women reported higher interactions with animals than men. Nevertheless, we could detect a significant correlation between time spent with the animals and interaction scores. Notably, 80?% of animal facility staff and 92?% of researchers rarely talked about their work with laboratory rodents with people outside their inner social circle.
Conclusions: Overall, the participants showed high awareness and sensitivity to rodent wellbeing; animal facility staff reported a similar perception on welfare questions, independently of their category, while researchers, who spent less time with the animals, showed less awareness and manifested lower human-animal interaction and less social support. Regarding the perception on social acceptance of laboratory animal work, all groups were cautious and rarely talked about their job, suggesting that it is considered a sensitive issue in Spain.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Environmental enrichment, Analgesia, Anesthesia, Euthanasia, Human-animal interaction, Social support, Laboratory rodent
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
 
|
|