Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0614819960020010057
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration
1996 Volume.2 No. 1 p.57 ~ p.72
Development of An Evaluation Tool for the Quality of Patient Care Chonic Renal Failure
Yang Young-Ock

Kim Moon-Sil
Abstract
Provision of better nursing care to patients is a difficult but important task. The first problerr for nursing quality improvement is development of evaluation tool for the quality of nursing care.
This study tries to develop a patient care tool for patients with chronic renal failure. This stu¡©dy as a procedural evaluation of patient care, tries to show what, how, at what order to provi¡©de care to patients with chronic renal failure.
This study is divided into process of developm¡©ent of tool, its reliability and validity.
Among process of development of tool is focal group, small expert group and expert evaluation group. To develop approprieteness of tool, nurses working is four major hospitals is Seoul were se¡©lected. To evaluate the credibility of subjects, 19 patient who were hospitalized and discharged w¡©ithin 3 months were selected. The period for col¡©lecting data for reliability and valiability evalua¡©tion was between Sept. 20 to Oct. 18, 1995.
The development process of this study is as fo¡©llows
1. Make preliminary list of the tool by focal gr¡©oup consisting of 8 clinical nurses.
2. Modify and add preliminary list by 4 expert nursing panel.
3. Calculate content validity of the tool by 23 n¡©ursing expert panel of judge. 4. Verity relability and validity of the tool.
5. Finalize an evaluation tool for the quality of nursing care in chronic renal failure patient.
The result of this study were as follows
1. Development of evaluation tool for the quality
of nursing care in chronic renal failure.
1) The evaluation of this study was developed
5 standards, 28 criteria, and 130 indicators
2) Nursing care evaluation scores for chronic
renal failure patients were average 68.8.
2. Verity reliability and validity of the tool.
1) 5 standards were divided into 4 point scale and according to 28 creteria, indicators of s¡©tandard were 3.72 and of criteria were 3.77
2) Inter - rater reliability (consentaneity sco¡©re) of the tool by pearson correlation coeffic¡©ient betwwen rates were r= .72, r= .75 and interreliabilities by single - facet crossed d¡©esign were r= .96.
3) The alpha coeffecient relating to internal c¡©
onsistency was .7259 over 27 items of 28 crit¡©
erias of developed tool.
Through this study, I¢¥m sure that the develop¡©ed tool for the quality of patient care in chronic¡©renal failure patient will show the way of more improvement of the quality of nursing care and effective nursing intervention.
KEYWORD
FullTexts / Linksout information
  
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed