|
KMID : 0614819960020020097
|
|
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration
1996 Volume.2 No. 2 p.97 ~ p.107
|
|
|
A study of the impact of using a nursing care standards on the quality of nursing care in gastrectomy patients
|
|
Woo Young-Ja
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Nursing standards determine the type and extent of services that are delivered to the patients and define quality care and communicate the institution´s expectations of care. Thus, taking the standard of care and incorporating it into a welldefined indicator of excellent patient care becomes one of the first activities in setting up the nursing service´s quality assurance process.
The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of using a nursing care standards for the quality of nursing care in gastrectomy patients. The subjects were composed of fourtytwo under going gastrectomy patients with stomach cancer in general surgery nursing care unit of K Cniversity Hospital in Pusan. The data was collected from January 3 to April 13.1996. The subjects were divided into a control group -those admitted from Jan.3 to Feb.12 and an experimental group those admitted from Feb.18 to April 13. The instruments used for this study were a nursing care standards in gastrectomy patients developed by the investigator and an evaluation tool for the quality of nursing care in abdominal surgery patients developed by Byoung-Sook Lee in 1995.
The data was analized by means of chi-square test, t-test and Cronbach-alpha test with the SAS System.
The result was as follows : The hypothesis, that scores of the quality of nursing care in the experimental group would be higher than that of the control group, was supported(t=-6.12, p=0.00).
The detailed results of each standards of evaluation tool were as follows : The mean score of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group in audit standard 1:"Collection of basic data of the patients", (t=-3. 76, p=0.00). The mean score of the experiment-al group was significantly higher than that of the control group in audit standard 2 : "Defining nursing diagnoses(or nursing problems)", (t= (-), p=(-) ). The mean score of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group in audit standard 3: "Estabilishment of nursing care plan according to nursing diagnoses (or nursing problems)’,(t= (-), p= (-) ). The mean score of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group in audit stndard 4:"Implimentation of nursing care plan", (t=-2.38, p=0.01). The mean score of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group in audit standard 8 : "Increase of the knowledge of health related to surgery ".(t=-2.40, p=0.01).
No significant differences between the mean scores of the experimental group and that of the control group in audit standard 5: "Recover and maintain of the physical function", audit standard 6:"Prevention of the post-operative complication", audit; standard 7 : "Decrease of discomfort caused by operation", and audit standard 9 : "Patient satisfaction in nursing care" were found.
The standards of evaluation tool were devided into two dimension. One was process dimension which contains four standards(audit standard 1 to 4), the other was outcome dimension which contains five standards (audit standard 5 to 9). The mean score of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group in process dimension (t=-12.30, p=0.00), but no significant difference between the mean scores of the experimental group and that of the control group in outcome dimension was found.
From these results, it is concluded that using a nursing care standards in gastrectomy patients promotes duality of nursing care and nursing care standards of various fields are necessary for effective nursing care.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Nursing care standard, Quality of nursing care
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
 
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
 
|
|