|
KMID : 0379319930180020141
|
|
Korean Journal of Rural Medicine
1993 Volume.18 No. 2 p.141 ~ p.151
|
|
|
Status of Tuberculosis Control in Rural Area
|
|
Park Chan-Byung
Chun Byung-Yeol
Yeh Min-Hae
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
This study was done about 371 tuberculosis(TB) patients composed 195 newly registered at Kyungju Gun Health Center from May 1989 to April 1990 (Group A) and 176 being treated at hospitals or private clinics from January 1988 to November 1989(Group B). When Group A patients visited and newly registered at Health Center, data was obtained by interviewing with a prepared questionnaire paper. And well trained inquirer visited Group B patients and obtained data by the same method from February 1990 to April 1990. The results are as follows ; Group A was generally lower than Group B in socioeconomic status and in family history of TB, the rate of Group A was 24.1% and higher than 11.9% in Group B(p<0.05). Knowledge about TB was improved more than past, but those who answered that TB is ’a communicable disease’ were 59.5% in Group A and 51.7% in Group B(p<0.05). Those answered that TB is ’a inherited disease’ were 9.2% and 11.4% each. And 1.7% of Group B answered that TB is ’a incurable disease’. Knowledge about TB treatment also was improved more than past, but in the rate of those who answered that TB is a curable disease provided by well treatment Group B(77.8%) was worse than Group A(91.3%). The rate of those who answered that TB were been able to cure by regularly anti-TB medication were 98.0% in Group A and 89.8% in Group B. Its difference was statistically significant. The rate that patients took the first diagnosis and wanted to receive treatments at the same organ were 34.9% of Group A at Health Center and 72.2% of Group B at hospitals or private clinics. And its difference was statistically significant. In the reasons that Group B knew Health Center treated pulmonary TB but they was treated at hospitals or private clinics, unreliability to Health Center was 48.1%. The reasons that Group A was treated at Health Center were ’because of trust’ 63.1%, ’because of low cost’ 50.3%, ’because of low cost except trust’9.3%, ’no specific reasons’ 27.7%. In the courses of knowing that TB was controlled at Health Center, ’by neighborhood, health worker and doctors’ were 84.9% in Group A and 69.0% in Group B. But ’by TV or radio’ were 8.2% in Group A and 14.7% in Group B, ’by school education’ 2.5% in Group A and 6.2% in Group B. Conclusively, Group A patients were lower than Group B in socioeconomic status, but better than in knowledge about TB. Its reasons was suggested that Health Center had controlled TB patients better than hospitals and private clinics. But considering, that difference in the rate of the same organ for the first diagnosis and treatment, that the only 63.0% of Group A have treated due to ’reliability to Health Center’, and that 48.1% of Group B knew that Health Center treated pulmonary TB but didn’t visit it due to ’unreliability to Health Center’, that public relations(PR) about use Health Center for pulmonary TB and health education for TB was thought to have to strengthened.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Tuberculosis, Rural arean
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|