Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1024620040240020146
Food Science of Animal Resources
2004 Volume.24 No. 2 p.146 ~ p.150
Evaluation of Un-Cooked Restructured Belly and Cooked Restructured Bacon using a Protein-Emulsion Material from Pork
Hur Sun-Jin

Kang Geun-Ho
Yang Han-Sul
Jeong Jin-Yeun
Park Gu-Boo
Joo Seon-Tea
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to develope the uncooked-restructured belly (URB) and the processed-restructured bacon (PRB) using a protein-emulsion material (PEM) from pork, and to evaluate the quality characteristics of the URB and PRB. The PEM used to adhere muscle and fat tissues was prepared with a salt-soluble protein and emulsions (ratio 9:1). In color measurements, L*/, a*/ and b*/ values were significantly (p£¼0.05) higher in URB than PRB. There was no significant difference in L*/ value between PRB from fresh pork and PRB from thaw pork PRB showed significantly (p£¼0.05) higher water holding capacity compared to URB. Tensil strength of PRB was also significantly (p£¼0.05) higher than that of URB. However, PRB from thawed pork marked the lowest color score among restructured meats in sensory evaluation. The scores of juiciness and tenderness were significantly (p£¼0.05) Higher in URB compared to PRB. Consequently URB had significantly (p.£¼0.05) higher score of overall acceptability than PRB. These results suggested that URB made with PEM could have a better sensory characteristics compared to PRB. Results also suggested that the PEM would not be enough to adhere fresh muscle and fat tissues as much as PRB, even though the possibility of PEM was confirmed as a meat glue.
KEYWORD
restructured meat, meat glue, restructured belly
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)