Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1025520000420030279
Journal of Animal Science and Technology
2000 Volume.42 No. 3 p.279 ~ p.288
Effect of Recycled Food Waste on the Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics in Growing - Finishing Pigs
Á¤ÀϺ´/Chung, I. B.
±èµ¿ÈÆ/¹®È«±æ/¹èÀÎÈÞ/³²º´¼·/±è¿µÈ­/Çã»ó¸¸/Kim, D. H./Moon, H. K./Bae, I. H./Nam, B. S./Kim, Y. H./Hur, S. M.
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the effect of feeding RFW (recycled food waste) on performance in growing-finishing pigs. Four treatments with 3 RFW levels were tried in this study; 0% PT (pellet containing 0% RFW), 30% MT (mash containing 30% RFW), 30% PT (pellet containing 30% RFW) and 50% PT (pellet containing 50% RFW). For feeding trials, 60 heads of cross-bred barrows (Duroc x Landrace: average live weight 30 §¸) were employed to 4 treatments with s replicates of 3 pigs each. For metabolic trials, 12 cross-bred barrows (average live weight 68 §¸) were used with 3 replicates. The results obtained are as followings;
ADG of 50% PT was significantly (P $lt; 0.05) lower than 0% PT and 30% PT, but 30% MT and 30% PT were not significantly different from 0% PT. In F/G ratio, 2.97 of 30% PT was not (P $gt; 0.05) significantly different from 2.85 of 0% PT treatment. Dressing percentage and back fat thickness were not significantly different among treatment. Addition of RFW increased appearance rate of carcass grade A or B. Nutrient digestibility was decreased by increasing RFW levels. The 30% PT was not significantly different from 0% PT in both DE and digestibility of crude fat and crude fiber, but significantly less in digestibility of crude protein and crude ash (P $lt; 0.05). Economic analysis based on feed cost per weight gain showed that pelleting feed with food waste 30% was the most economical.
KEYWORD
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information