|
KMID : 1100820200100010039
|
|
Laboratory Medicine Online
2020 Volume.10 No. 1 p.39 ~ p.45
|
|
|
Comparison of Serum Creatinine Measurements among Roche Modular D, Cobas 8000 c702, and Beckman Coulter AU5800, by Jaffe and Enzymatic Methods
|
|
Oh Jong-Won
Park Hyung-Doo
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Background: Creatinine (Cr) is a representative biomarker reflecting renal function. In this study, we compared serum Cr levels using Roche Modular D (Roche Diagnostics, Germany), Roche Cobas 8000 c702 (Roche Diagnostics), and AU5800 (Beckman Coulter, USA). In addition, we assessed the differences in Cr measurements using the Jaffe and enzymatic methods.
Methods: Precision, linearity, and methods were evaluated in accordance with CLSI guidelines. Serum Cr was measured by Modular D following the Jaffe method, and serum Cr was measured by Cobas 8000 c702 and AU5800, following the Jaffe and enzyme methods.
Results: All of the total coefficients of variations (CVs) were below 5%. Linearity was observed in the performance ranges evaluated (r>0.99, slope: 0.965 and 0.955). When Modular D and Cobas 8000c 702 were compared, the slope and y-intercept were 0.9928 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9802 to 1.000) and -0.0156 (95% CI: -0.0200 to -0.0054), respectively. The slope and y-intercept were 0.9811 (95% CI: 0.9570 to 0.9951) and -0.0484 (95% CI: -0.0638 to -0.0297) when Modular D and Au5800 were compared. Serum Cr measured by Cobas 8000 c702 and AU5800 using the Jaffe method were 3.2% and 6.9% lower than the values measured by Modular D, respectively. Both Modular D and Cobas 8000 c702 showed acceptable accuracies.
Conclusions: Serum Cr measurements using Cobas 8000 c702 and AU5800 were comparable to those measured by Modular D, and showed satisfactory precision and linearity; thus, these techniques could be useful for clinical laboratories.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Creatinine, Enzyme method, Jaffe method, Modular D, Cobas 8000 c702, AU5800
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|