Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1148120200100020039
Journal of Advanced Spine Surgery
2020 Volume.10 No. 2 p.39 ~ p.47
Surgical Treatment of Pyogenic Spondylitis Around the Cage Using Metal Cages in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cases
Ko Dong-Oh

Ahn Dong-Ki
Shin Won-Shik
Whang Il-Chan
Abstract
Introduction: A spondylitis developed after a surgery has been usually treated with drainage and curettage through anterior approach and autoiliac strut bone graft. However, anterior support with titanium cage combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation has been attempted. Implanting a foreign material is usually prohibited at an active pyogenic infection site. We tried to prove the usefulness of chip bone graft with metal cages in surgical treatment of spondylitis developed in posterior lumbar intebody fusion cases.

Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study. The patients who received posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) between Jan. 2007 and Dec 2017 and had a spondylitis around the cage were reviewed. There were 1,831 PLIFs during the study period. There were 32 cases of surgical site infection and 20 of them were spondylitis around the cage. Ten out of the 20 cases had a revision surgery. All implants removal, drainage and curettage were done and interbody bone graft and pedicle screw re-fixation was done simultaneously. Five cases used autoiliac strut bone (Group I) and the other 5 cases used titanium cage and autoiliac chip bone (Group II) as interbody graft materials. The demographic, diagnostic and microbiological characteristics were investigated and the results of treatment were compared between the two groups.

Results: The diagnosis of infection was made at 282.0¡¾106.1 (180~410) days in group I and 209¡¾118.4 (75~335) days in group II after the PLIF. All cases had neither general fever nor local manifestations like heating and redness etc. All patients had back pain, however, only 2 cases of group II had neurological symptoms. C-reactive protein (CRP) level was elevated at 2 weeks from the PLIF in all cases (p<0.001). All cases had implant loosening at the time of their diagnosis. There was no failure of infection control. All cases showed normalization of CRP and radiological interbody fusion. The final Oswestry disability index (ODI) showed no difference between the two groups. ODI improved from 54.6¡¾11.5 to 42.2¡¾6.8 in group I (p=0.095) and from 63.6¡¾6.9 to 44.8¡¾11.7 in group II (p=0.025).

Conclusion: For the surgical treatment of spondylitis that were developed in PLIF, a comprehensive one stage operation that comprised all implants removal, drainage and curettage followed by simultaneous intebody bone graft with metal cages and pedicle screw re-fixation was useful to control the infection.
KEYWORD
Spondylitis around a cage, Posterior lumbar interbody fusion, Metal cage
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information