KMID : 1195620240170010046
|
|
Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology 2024 Volume.17 No. 1 p.46 ~ p.55
|
|
Early Postoperative Benefits in Receptive and Expressive Language Development After Cochlear Implantation Under 9 Months of Age in Comparison to Implantation at Later Ages
|
|
Lee Seung-Jae
Oh Heon-Jeong Shin Kyu-Ha Park Sung-Min Kim Yun-Kyeong Jung Do-Hyun Yang Ji-Yeon Chun Ye-Jun Kim Min-Young Han Jin-Hee Kim Ju-Ang Ngoc-Trinh Tran Kim Bong-Jik Choi Byung-Yoon
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Objectives. The recent expansion of eligibility for cochlear implantation (CI) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)to include infants as young as 9 months has reignited debates concerning the clinically appropriate cut-off age for pe-diatric CI. Our study compared the early postoperative trajectories of receptive and expressive language developmentin children who received CI before 9 months of age with those who received it between 9 and 12 months. This studyinvolved a unique pediatric cohort with documented etiology, where the timing of CI was based on objective criteriaand efforts were made to minimize the influence of parental socioeconomic status.
Methods. A retrospective review of 98 pediatric implantees recruited at a tertiary referral center was conducted. The timingof CI was based on auditory and language criteria focused on the extent of delay corresponding to the bottom 1st per-centile of language development among age-matched controls, with patients categorized into very early (CI at <9 months),early (CI at 9?12 months) and delayed (CI at 12?18 months) CI groups. Postoperative receptive/expressive languagedevelopment was assessed using the Sequenced Language Scale for Infants receptive and expressive standardizedscores and percentiles.
Results. Only the very early CI group showed significant improvements in receptive language starting at 3 months post-CI,aligning with normal-hearing peers by 9 months and maintaining this level until age 2 years. During this period(<2 years), all improvements were more pronounced in receptive language than in expressive language.
Conclusion. CI before 9 months of age significantly improved receptive language development compared to later CI, withimprovements sustained at least up to the age of 2. This study supports the consideration of earlier CI, beyond pediat-ric Food and Drug Administration labeling criteria ( >9 months), in children with profound deafness who have a cleardeafness etiology and language development delays ( <1st percentile).
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
Cochlear Implantation, Cochlear Implants, Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Language Development, Speech Disorder
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|