|
KMID : 1234820110120020129
|
|
Korean Society of Law and Medicine
2011 Volume.12 No. 2 p.129 ~ p.158
|
|
|
The Criteria of Medical Malpractice of Medical Doctors and Oriental Medical Doctors in Korea
|
|
Lee Baek-Hyu
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
The Korea health care system has been divided into Western and Oriental (Korea traditional) medicine since 1951. In accordance with dualistic medical system, there are many conflict cases between medical doctors and oriental medical doctors. Meanwhile, there were much discussions about the meaning and criteria of medical malpractice(negligence). Especially, many cases have been built up about the criteria of medical malpractice through lawsuits. But, comparatively, there’s few the medical malpractice case of the oriental medical doctors. According to a recent ruling of the Supreme Court, the legal principles of medical doctor’s malpractice case are equally applied to the criteria of the oriental medical doctor’s malpractice case. But there are much considerations in addition to these principles for the dualistic medical system and academic distinctiveness. This study is intended to review the dualistic medical system, the criterion of medical malpractice, and analysis this issues. To make long story short, under our dualistic medical system, judging the medical and oriental malpractice should be considered relatively. However, it makes sense that we want medical doctor or oriental medical doctor to demand the reinforced negligence to restrict the unnecessary discretion. If there is lack of evidence-based medicine or the rationality suspected, the health care providers must give enough proof.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Medical malpractice, Medical dispute, Practice of (Western) medicine, Practice of oriental medicine, Medical services act
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|